Michele Louise Schiocchet explores the object as a connector of people and places. Based on the idea of the palimpsest, the memory of the object is activated through new interactions, re-imprinted or re-projected onto the body of the object. The overlapping spatialities aim to create open narratives that are accumulated in layers. Michele Louise Schiocchet’s artistic practice takes up the hidden narratives of space. She is based in London and Brazil.
“My experiment with the NBP is a sort of work in progress, where I am trying to engage with spatialities, communicating spaces and people through the manipulation of traces. My present research is an interdisciplinary practice based project that explores also the possibilities of portraying everyday life; investigating conceptually and practically, creative interactions with everyday life spaces.
The city is seen as a site of transformation where a mesh is created between present and past occupations (Soja 2000: 137), being the space marked and organized with a net of signs, created by the ideological system. (Castells 1977: 126-7 in Soja 2000: 161).
For Manuel de Castells, there is no possible division between reality and production of symbols, due to the symbolic character of cultures: ´All the symbols result in something displaced in relation with its assigned semantic meaning. In a certain sense, all the reality is perceived virtually.´ (Castells 2001: 47)
Images could influence the interpretation of the everyday. A. Schlottmann and J. Miggelbrink affirm that more than reflecting or representing a space or a ‘reality’, they are interfaces of their constitution (A. Schlottmann & J. Miggelbrink 2009)
David Harvey introduces the idea of palimpsest pointing that the contemporary city is formed by several layers, overlapping traces of different generations.
The interaction with the city’s palimpsest is a tactical attempt to revert the relationship of dominance and creating narratives traced by the individuals themselves. ‘The approach to culture begins when the ordinary man becomes the narrator, when it is he who defines the (common) place of discourse and the (anonymous) space of its development.’ (Certeau 1984: 5).
The analysis and development of practical work is useful to evaluate how aesthetic choices could conceptually influence the development and perception of an artwork; selecting features such as possible mediums and aesthetics, to be applied practically (constantly) rephrasing our inquiries.
My research started through a video installation/ urban interventions called Urban Fragments (available on: http://vimeo.com/channels/63610), investigating: ‘How fragments of urban experiences can virtually and geographically dialogue?’ The work was based on “walks”, exploring interactions with urban palimpsests and the creation of ‘walking narratives’.
Inhabiting simultaneously several spaces, an individual could engage differently with
each part of a trajectory, producing simultaneous narratives and layers of interpretation.
These layers accumulate stories, converting constantly from sign to space (experience),
being the meaning not contained in any surface but between them all and the act of
looking. I am locating the focus of the project on the connections between subject portrayed, portrait and the act of portraying, exploring overlaps and interdependencies.
Promoting a playful communication and stimulating a reflexive positioning towards the everyday practices, we can maybe re-propose fragments of spaces that hopefully as Benjamin suggest: ‘not only dreams the one to follow but, in dreaming, precipitates its awakening.’ (Benjamin 2008: 109)”
My experience with the NBP is not yet finalized, as I aim to conclude with a short video which is still in the process of being edited. When ready it will be posted on: http://vimeo.com/channels/63610